Question T0C06
From subelement T0 - T0C
Which of the following is an acceptable method to determine whether your station complies with FCC RF exposure regulations?
Why is this correct?
All three methods are FCC-approved for RF exposure compliance evaluation. Calculation using FCC OET Bulletin 65 provides standardized formulas and tables. Computer modeling uses specialized software to predict RF fields. Field strength measurement with calibrated equipment provides direct verification. Each method has advantages: calculations are cost-effective, modeling handles complex scenarios, and measurements provide real-world verification.
Memory tip
When facing 'All these choices are correct' answers, systematically verify each option rather than looking for the 'best' one. The FCC intentionally provides multiple compliance paths to accommodate different station configurations and technical capabilities.
Learn more
The FCC's multi-path approach reflects practical amateur radio needs. Small stations might use OET Bulletin 65 calculations, complex installations benefit from computer modeling, and stations near exposure limits often require field measurements for verification. This flexibility ensures compliance is achievable regardless of technical complexity or budget. The three methods can be used independently or together for comprehensive evaluation of maximum permissible exposure compliance.
Think about it
Why do you think the FCC allows multiple methods for RF exposure evaluation instead of requiring just one standardized approach?