FCC Question Pool Review

Technician Class (Element 2) • 2022-2026

Switch License

Question T1C07

From subelement T1 - T1C

T1C07Rule 97.23
Answer: B

Which of the following can result in revocation of the station license or suspension of the operator license?

AFailure to inform the FCC of any changes in the amateur station following performance of an RF safety environmental evaluation
BFailure to provide and maintain a correct email address with the FCC
CFailure to obtain FCC type acceptance prior to using a home-built transmitter
DFailure to have a copy of your license available at your station

Why is this correct?

The FCC requires all amateur operators to maintain a current email address in their database per Part 97.23. This isn't optional—failure to provide and maintain a correct email address can result in license revocation or suspension. The other choices describe violations that carry different penalties: RF safety evaluation changes require notification but don't trigger revocation, home-built transmitters don't need type acceptance, and having a license copy at your station isn't required for validity.

Memory tip

When studying FCC rules, distinguish between administrative requirements (like email addresses) that can cause license loss versus technical violations that typically result in warnings or fines first. Administrative compliance failures often have the harshest immediate consequences because they prevent the FCC from communicating with licensees.

Learn more

The email requirement reflects modern licensing administration—the FCC moved from paper-based to electronic communications for efficiency. Your email address is your official communication link with the Commission for license renewals, enforcement actions, and regulatory updates. This requirement ensures the FCC can reach all licensees quickly for important announcements or compliance matters, making email maintenance as critical as maintaining your station identification privileges.

Think about it

Why do you think the FCC considers inability to contact a licensee serious enough to warrant license revocation rather than just a warning or fine?